Static-first / Accessibility

Static Sites and Accessibility

Use semantic HTML and progressive enhancement so core content and navigation work before JavaScript is added.

Where it fits

Choose architecture by the job.

Accessibility comes from design and implementation, not rendering mode alone. Static-first can make the core experience simpler.

Important

Static-first is not static-only.

Astro can keep most pages pre-rendered while individual components or routes use client-side interactivity, serverless functions or on-demand rendering where the product needs it.

Advantages

Why we prefer the static-first baseline.

01 / Advantage

Semantic HTML first

02 / Advantage

Less JavaScript dependence

03 / Advantage

Stable structure

04 / Advantage

Progressive enhancement

05 / Advantage

Fewer runtime states

06 / Advantage

No-JS baseline testing

Tradeoffs

The architecture still has to fit the business.

We would rather explain the tradeoffs than sell a platform as magic.

Tradeoff 01

Interactive components still need accessibility work

Tradeoff 02

Visual design still needs testing

Tradeoff 03

Third-party embeds can introduce barriers

FAQ

Questions about Static Sites and Accessibility.

Static-first is an architecture choice, not a religion. The right answer depends on how the business edits content and where real-time behavior belongs.

What is Static Sites and Accessibility?

Use semantic HTML and progressive enhancement so core content and navigation work before JavaScript is added.

When is Static Sites and Accessibility a good fit?

Accessibility comes from design and implementation, not rendering mode alone. Static-first can make the core experience simpler.

What are the main tradeoffs?

The main tradeoffs to plan for are Interactive components still need accessibility work, Visual design still needs testing, Third-party embeds can introduce barriers.